The National Cathedral project, proposed by the government in March 2017 as a symbol of unity, spirituality, and national identity, continues to stir controversy among Ghanaians.

Initially envisioned as a $350-million interdenominational Christian cathedral with a 5,000-seat auditorium, chapels, a baptistery, and other religious facilities, the project is now at the center of a fierce national debate.

While the initiative has received support from some prominent figures — including the Asantehene and various religious leaders — a growing number of citizens are raising concerns over its financing, timing, and relevance amid Ghana’s current economic challenges.

The government’s decision to allocate an additional GH¢25 million to the National Cathedral Secretariat has reignited widespread backlash. Critics argue that the move contradicts earlier assurances that the project would be primarily funded through voluntary donations from the Christian community.

This funding commitment has left many questioning the government’s priorities, particularly in a period marked by rising inflation, a high unemployment rate, unpaid public sector allowances, and insufficient access to healthcare and education in some parts of the country.

“Are there not already enough churches in Ghana? What about using existing national venues like Independence Square for spiritual gatherings?” some Ghanaians have asked on social media and public forums.

The timing of the project has drawn criticism for appearing out of touch with the daily struggles of ordinary citizens. Many argue that national funds should be channeled into more pressing needs such as infrastructure, job creation, quality education, and the completion of promised initiatives like the Agenda 111 hospitals and the One District, One Factory programme.

“If this Cathedral is a personal promise to God by the President, then he should also fulfill his promises to the people of Ghana,” one civil society activist remarked.

There is a growing sentiment that while the project may hold religious and cultural value, it should not be pursued at the expense of national development and fiscal prudence.

Calls for Accountability and Prioritization

Critics have called on the government to reassess its spending priorities and be transparent about the source and use of funds for the Cathedral. There are increasing demands for a public audit of the project, and for Parliament to exercise stronger oversight over taxpayer-funded initiatives.

In the face of deepening economic strain, Ghanaians are urging the government to put people before prestige, calling the National Cathedral a symbol that risks becoming more divisive than unifying.

“The true worship of God,” one commentator noted, “is seen in how leaders treat their people — with justice, compassion, and accountability.”

As debates continue, the National Cathedral has become more than a construction project — it is now a litmus test for how Ghanaians view leadership, governance, and national priorities in challenging times.